Howling


[This entry has been temporarily removed.]

Comments

  1. Carolina AndújarFebruary 6, 2009 at 3:23 AM

    I really, really liked this tale. Man, that last part where the dog is out on the porch, hurt, is so moving. Very sad. Good tale.

    ReplyDelete
  2. F. EscobarFebruary 6, 2009 at 10:45 AM

    I'm absolutely not for treating animals poorly, so that part felt cruel. Blame Mr. Worcester, though. What did you make of the narrator?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carolina AndújarFebruary 8, 2009 at 5:50 AM

    The guy that doesn't dare intervene? Gosh, probably someone like me, someone who wears leather even being against animal abuse... Although I would've stopped Mr. Worcester, though; there's something about live cruelty that doesn't admit delays.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Carolina AndújarFebruary 8, 2009 at 5:51 AM

    Oh, and "his" dog, that I have never bought.

    ReplyDelete
  5. F. EscobarFebruary 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM

    True, animal cruelty is terrible stuff. I still have dreadful flashes of a video I saw of how dogs are skinned alive in China to turn them into fur for the lining of coats and other clothing.

    I guess my question about the narrator goes along these lines: I know it's tempting, but what made you think it was a "guy" who didn't dare intervene? Check out, for instance, the couple of words in italics in the story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Carolina AndújarFebruary 8, 2009 at 11:04 PM

    A girl narrator! I had not thought of that possibility... that's really cool. Jeez, I should've noticed the oddity of the remark.
    So this woman left her husband for another woman who lived in the neighborhood?

    Oh wow, the China dogs story is horrible. Fiction is a good to criticize animal cruelty (and everything else).

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousFebruary 20, 2009 at 10:39 PM

    The interesting thing, I think, is why you chose the photo to accompany the story.

    ReplyDelete
  8. F. EscobarFebruary 21, 2009 at 9:53 AM

    Doesn't it look placid enough? One would not want to ruin the main part of the story with a more revealing picture at the start. Right?

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousFebruary 21, 2009 at 11:06 AM

    I think the reason you chose the photo is very revealing: it's a representation of setting. It would be a very different story if this was your front porch:

    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/02/22/arts/Ouro600.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  10. F. EscobarFebruary 26, 2009 at 9:00 PM

    You're absolutely right: the story would register differently with the porch you mentioned. But I must admit the picture was really an afterthought, chosen ex post facto and in a relative rush. It had to portray a placid suburb, and it couldn't show a dog (as to not ruin the main part of the story). That was the rationale.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Carolina AndújarMarch 5, 2009 at 8:08 PM

    I came to see your new post and didn't find it :(
    Love ya.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

El nuevo cuento latinoamericano

Image
La industria del cuento norteamericana es enorme (antes me he referido a algunas de sus manifestaciones): Best American Short Stories cada año, Best Nonrequired Nonfiction cada año, Pushcart Prize cada año, docenas de revistas trimestrales (como McSweeney’s , Zoetrope: All-Story y Kenyon Review ), One Story , Black Lawrence Press , etcétera. Un poco embriagado con eso, fui a la librería más grande de San Juan y pedí una buena antología de cuentos en español. Me mostraron un manojo con cuentos traducidos al español, pero yo quería cuentos escritos en español. Encontré un gran total de una: la que hoy reseño, El nuevo cuento latinoamericano , publicada por Norma en el 2009. Está disponible parcialmente en Google Books, aquí . Antes de que me lo digan, claro que existen otras antologías. Sólo que no las había. El adjetivo “nuevo” en el título es sencillo de explicar: los doce cuentos fueron publicados en el siglo veintiuno, bien sea por autores jóvenes (Samanta Schweblin) o por auto
Read more

Vallejo desde el desbarrancadero

Image
Fernando Vallejo, El desbarrancadero . Bogotá: Alfaguara (2001), 194 pp. Durante mucho tiempo no había querido leer a Fernando Vallejo. En sus columnas había encontrado una prédica de virilidad y prejuicio, de odio e impulsividad, que me parecía una postura fingida hasta el punto de volvérsele una máscara inescapable. No seguí leyendo sus columnas, y evité sus novelas. Sin embargo, con los años empecé a acumular recomendaciones enfáticas. Uno de los vallejistas, en cuyo criterio confío, me confesó guardar sus copias de las obras de Vallejo junto a la Biblia. En últimas, di el brazo a torcer. El resultado fue que leí El desbarrancadero . Mi primera impresión fue la risa: ¿cómo no reírse cuando un narrador cascarrabias, ágil con las palabras y acerbo con las ideas, destruye tanto la cabeza del títere como el títere y la tarima? Es una proeza mantener ese tono cáustico durante casi 200 páginas, y el autor lo logra, pero termina por volverse repetitivo y no alcanza a darle a la obra
Read more

Reading (and) Fahrenheit 451

Image
Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451 (The 50 th Anniversary Edition) . New York: Picador (1998), 190 pp. So how do you get kids to read? I read a stray article written by a well-known novelist who shrugged off the problem. This concern has been blown out of proportion, she said. Thanks to steep literacy levels, more people are reading now than at any other time in history. Numerically, this is true. But I think the rebuttal misses the point: as I see it, people are worried because those who got an education used to be deeply committed to reading; many of those who get an education today are reading-averse. I’ve had quite a few former students confess that they read one or no books before college; and I’ve talked to several educated adults who admit that they haven’t read a full book in, say, a decade (or more). So back to square one: how do you get kids to read? If you ask Ray Bradbury, as you can see in the interview that accompanies the 50 th Anniversary Edition of Fahrenheit 451 , this
Read more